Email Alerts
RSS
Performance evaluation index for deepwater channel project of Yangtze River downstream of Nanjing
-
摘要: 为全面衡量长江南京以下12.5 m深水航道工程建设成效，以该工程的价值取向和内在逻辑为基本原则，基于“价值-目的-目标-指标和标准”关系链，以深水航道项目价值取向为核心，通过正反推演分析出一套切实遵循项目目标、紧密联系项目内容的绩效评价指标体系，并通过专家问卷调查进行验证分析。相较于现有的航道工程指导类绩效评价指标体系，该指标体系不仅是对工程本身的实施以及成绩的评价，更注重对当下国家重大战略决策落实程度的评价，以期反映该工程与国民经济、社会发展、资源环境之间的关系。Abstract: To comprehensively measure the construction achievement of 12.5 m deepwater channel project of the Yangtze River downstream of Nanjing, based on the fundamental principles of value orientation and internal logic and the relationship chain of “Values-Goals-Objectives-Criteria and Standards”, we used the positive and negative deductive analysis to propose a set of performance evaluation indexes for the major state construction project that strictly follows the project objectives and closely links with the project content. According to the expert questionnaire survey, the performance evaluation index set was confirmed. The results indicate that compared with the existing performance evaluation index guidance for inland waterway engineering, the proposed index set not only focuses on the project’s construction achievements, but also pays more attention to the implementation of the strategic value for the regional and national development by revealing the relationship between the project and the national economy, social development, resources and environment comprehensively.
-
Key words:
- Yangtze River /
- deepwater channel /
- performance evaluation /
- index /
- value orientation
-
图 2 绩效评价指标体系反向推演
Figure 2. Reverse deduction diagram of the performance evaluation indexes
图 4 深水航道工程绩效评价指标体系
Figure 4. Performance evaluation indexes for 12.5 m deepwater channel project
表 1 绩效评价指标评分样本均值及修正均值统计
Table 1. Sampled and modified mean values of each performance evaluation index
准则层 实施内容 建设成绩 经济效益 指标层 资金筹措
与使用人力物资
配备规章制度
执行进度和质
量控制通航能力
达标整治建筑
物可靠配套工程
完备科学技术
创新港口海
港化吞吐量
增加运输成
本降低港口一
体化均值 4.64 4.56 4.58 4.67 4.53 4.61 4.50 4.72 4.22 4.44 4.56 4.17 标准差 0.54 0.50 0.65 0.54 0.65 0.55 0.56 0.45 0.78 0.65 0.65 0.74 修正均值 11.7 13.1 8.0 12.2 7.7 11.3 10.3 17.3 4.5 7.4 7.8 5.1 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 曹民雄, 应翰海, 钱明霞. 长江南京以下12.5 m深水航道建设一期工程的主要技术问题与研究成果[J]. 水运工程,2012(11):5-13. (CAO Minxiong, YING Hanhai, QIAN Mingxia. Main technical problems and research achievement of 12.5 m deep-water channel construction phase Ⅰ of the Yangtze River below Nanjing city[J]. Port & Waterway Engineering, 2012(11): 5-13. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-4972.2012.11.002 [2] 谭君崇, 夏雪, 杨雪英. 交通运输预算支出绩效评价的探索与实践[J]. 交通财会,2013(2):20-24. (TAN Junchong, XIA Xue, YANG Xueying. Exploration and practice of performance evaluation of transportation budget expenditure[J]. Finance & Accounting for Communications, 2013(2): 20-24. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9016.2013.02.005 [3] NASSAR N, ABOURIZK S. Practical application for integrated performance measurement of construction projects[J]. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2014, 30(6): 04014027. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000287 [4] KATZELL R A, THOMPSON D E. An integrative model of work attitudes, motivation, and performance[J]. Human Performance, 1990, 3(2): 63-85. doi: 10.1207/s15327043hup0302_1 [5] ZHENG L, BARON C, ESTEBAN P, et al. A framework to improve performance measurement in engineering projects[J]. Insight, 2017, 20(4): 40-43. doi: 10.1002/inst.12180 [6] BEHN R D. Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures[J]. Public Administration Review, 2003, 63(5): 586-606. doi: 10.1111/1540-6210.00322 [7] BITITCI U S, CARRIE A S, MCDEVITT L. Integrated performance measurement systems: a development guide[J]. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 1997, 17(5): 522-534. [8] HERNON P. The government performance and results act[J]. Government Information Quarterly, 1998, 15(2): 53-156. [9] KAPLAN R S, NORTON D P. The balanced scorecard-measures that drive performance[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1992, 70(1): 71-79. [10] 罗斌元, 马玉玲. 财政支出基本建设项目绩效评价通用指标体系的构建[J]. 地方财政研究,2006(9):17-21. (LUO Binyuan, MA Yuling. Construction of general index system for performance evaluation of financial expenditure capital construction project[J]. Sub National Fiscal Research, 2006(9): 17-21. (in Chinese) [11] MEYER M D, MILLER E J. Urban transportation planning: a decision-oriented approach[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1984. [12] CRONBACH L J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests[J]. Psychometrika, 1951, 16(3): 297-334. doi: 10.1007/BF02310555 [13] EBOLI L, MAZZULLA G. A new customer satisfaction index for evaluating transit service quality[J]. Journal of Public Transportation, 2009, 12(3): 21-37. doi: 10.5038/2375-0901.12.3.2 -
点击查看大图
图(4) / 表 (1)
计量
- 文章访问数: 367
- HTML全文浏览量: 134
- PDF下载量: 27
- 被引次数: 0
