Email Alerts
RSS
Rock strength and deformation characteristics under different unloading rates
-
摘要: 岩体工程的开挖本质上是岩体的卸荷过程，不同的卸荷速率会显著影响岩体的强度变形特性，开展相关研究对于岩体工程的安全稳定分析具有重要意义。针对岩石开挖卸荷中各种可能的应力路径，开展了普通三轴压缩试验以及恒主应力差卸围压、恒轴压卸围压、升轴压卸围压的3种卸荷试验，重点分析了不同卸荷速率对开挖卸荷岩体力学特性的影响规律。研究得出主要结论如下：（1）不同卸荷方案、不同卸荷速率的岩样，都具有典型的脆性破坏特征，当围压降低到一定程度时，岩样突然破坏，轴压陡降，环向应变显著增大。（2）当围压卸荷速率较高，岩样临近破坏时，变形模量随围压卸荷比的变化曲线几乎成90°直线下降，泊松比随围压卸荷比的变化曲线几乎成90°直线上升；而卸荷速率较低时，变形模量和泊松比下降/增长的趋势相对较缓。这说明围压卸荷速率越大，岩样脆性破坏特征越显著。（3）3种卸荷方案岩样在不同的卸荷速率下，破坏时的应力状态基本都位于普通三轴压缩Mogi-Coulomb强度包络线的下方，即围压卸荷时的岩样比普通三轴压缩状态的岩样更容易破坏。Abstract: The excavation of rock mass engineering is essentially the unloading process of rock mass, and different unloading rates will significantly affect the strength and deformation characteristics of rock mass, which is of great significance to the safety and stability analysis of rock mass engineering. For modeling various unloading stress paths in the rock mass excavation, the ordinary triaxial compression test, constant axial pressure unloading confining pressure test, loading axial pressure and unloading confining pressure test, and constant principal stress difference unloading confining pressure test were conducted in this research. The effects of different unloading rates on the mechanical properties of rock mass were analyzed. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) Rock shows typical brittle failure characteristics under different unloading paths and different unloading rates, when the confining pressure decreases to a certain value, the rock sample suddenly fails, the axial pressure drops sharply, and the circumferential strain ε3 increases significantly. (2) If the confining pressure unloading rate is high, when the rock sample is near failure, the deformation modulus E decreases linearly almost at a 90° angle, and Poisson’s ratio μ increases linearly almost at a 90° angle. If the unloading rate is low, the decreasing/increasing trend of E and μ is relatively slower. This shows that the brittle failure of rock sample is more obvious with the increasing unloading rate of confining pressure. (3) The stress state of rock samples under the three unloading paths are basically below the strength envelope of ordinary triaxial compression Mogi-Coulomb, which shows that the rock sample under confining pressure unloading is more easily damaged than that under normal triaxial compression.
-
Key words:
- rock /
- unloading rate /
- strength /
- deformation characteristics /
- unloading confining pressure
-
图 1 普通三轴压缩试验应力应变曲线
Figure 1. Stress-strain curves in general triaxial compression test
图 2 普通三轴压缩试验结果及拟合
Figure 2. Test results and fitting in general triaxial compression test
图 3 不同卸荷路径及卸荷速率下岩样的应力应变曲线
Figure 3. Stress-strain curves of rock samples under different unloading paths and different unloading rates
图 4 不同卸荷路径及卸荷速率下岩样的变形模量
Figure 4. Deformation modulus of rock samples under different unloading paths and different unloading rates
图 5 不同卸荷路径及卸荷速率下岩样的泊松比
Figure 5. Poisson's ratio of rock samples under different unloading paths and different unloading rates
图 6 不同卸荷速率岩样破坏时的围压
Figure 6. Confining pressure of rock samples at different unloading rates
表 1 试验加卸荷方案
Table 1. Test loading and unloading schemes
试验
方案试样
编号卸荷时初始
围压/MPa卸荷时初始
轴压/MPa围压卸荷速
率/(MPa·s−1)轴压卸荷速
率/(MPa·s−1)试验
方案试样
编号卸荷时初始
围压/MPa卸荷时初始
轴压/MPa围压卸荷速
率/(MPa·s−1)轴压卸荷速
率/(MPa·s−1)方案Ⅰ：普通三
轴压缩试验Ⅰ-1 10 -- -- -- 方案Ⅲ：恒主应
力差卸围压Ⅲ-1 30 89.8 −0.05 −0.05 Ⅰ-2 20 -- -- -- Ⅲ-2 30 90.2 −0.10 −0.10 Ⅰ-3 30 -- -- -- Ⅲ-3 30 89.4 −0.25 −0.25 Ⅰ-4 40 -- -- -- Ⅲ-4 30 89.8 −0.50 −0.50 Ⅲ-5 30 89.1 −0.85 −0.85 方案Ⅱ：恒轴
压卸围压Ⅱ-1 30 88.7 −0.05 -- 方案Ⅳ：升轴
压卸围压Ⅳ-1 30 68.6 −0.05 0.25 Ⅱ-2 30 90.5 −0.10 -- Ⅳ-2 30 62.4 −0.10 0.25 Ⅱ-3 30 90.9 −0.25 -- Ⅳ-3 30 62.8 −0.25 0.25 Ⅱ-4 30 89.5 −0.50 -- Ⅳ-4 30 64.7 −0.50 0.25 Ⅱ-5 30 90.5 −0.85 -- Ⅳ-5 30 64.7 −0.85 0.25 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 李地元, 孙志, 李夕兵, 等. 不同应力路径下花岗岩三轴加卸载力学响应及其破坏特征[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2016,35(增刊2):3449-3457. (LI Diyuan, SUN Zhi, LI Xibing, et al. Mechanical response and failure characteristics of granite under different stress paths in triaxial loading and unloading conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2016, 35(Suppl2): 3449-3457. (in Chinese) [2] 张凯, 周辉, 潘鹏志, 等. 不同卸荷速率下岩石强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学,2010,31(7):2072-2078. (ZHANG Kai, ZHOU Hui, PAN Pengzhi, et al. Characteristics of strength of rocks under different unloading rates[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(7): 2072-2078. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2010.07.009 [3] 丛宇, 王在泉, 郑颖人, 等. 不同卸荷路径下大理岩破坏过程能量演化规律[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版),2016,47(9):3140-3147. (CONG Yu, WANG Zaiquan, ZHENG Yingren, et al. Energy evolution principle of fracture propagation of marble with different unloading stress paths[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2016, 47(9): 3140-3147. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7207.2016.09.031 [4] 李地元, 谢涛, 李夕兵, 等. Mogi-Coulomb强度准则应用于岩石三轴卸荷破坏试验的研究[J]. 科技导报,2015,33(19):84-90. (LI Diyuan, XIE Tao, LI Xibing, et al. On the Mogi-Coulomb strength criterion as applied to rock triaxial unloading test[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2015, 33(19): 84-90. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2015.19.014 [5] 姚吉康, 王志亮. 华山花岗岩力学特性及能量演化规律研究[J]. 水利水运工程学报,2018(3):78-85. (YAO Jikang, WANG Zhiliang. Study on mechanical property and energy evolution law of Huashan granite[J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2018(3): 78-85. (in Chinese) [6] 杨圣奇, 徐卫亚, 苏承东. 大理岩三轴压缩变形破坏与能量特征研究[J]. 工程力学,2007,24(1):136-142. (YANG Shengqi, XU Weiya, SU Chengdong. Study on the deformation failure and energy properties of marble specimen under triaxial compression[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2007, 24(1): 136-142. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4750.2007.01.023 [7] 李新平, 肖桃李, 汪斌, 等. 锦屏二级水电站大理岩不同应力路径下加卸载试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2012,31(5):882-889. (LI Xinping, XIAO Taoli, WANG Bin, et al. Experimental study of Jinping II hydropower station marble under loading and unloading stress paths[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(5): 882-889. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6915.2012.05.003 [8] 黄润秋, 黄达. 高地应力条件下卸荷速率对锦屏大理岩力学特性影响规律试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2010,29(1):21-33. (HUANG Runqiu, HUANG Da. Experimental research on affection laws of unloading rates on mechanical properties of Jinping marble under high geostress[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29(1): 21-33. (in Chinese) [9] 王乐华, 牛草原, 张冰祎, 等. 不同应力路径下深埋软岩力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2019,38(5):973-981. (WANG Lehua, NIU Caoyuan, ZHANG Bingyi, et al. Experimental study on mechanical properties of deep-buried soft rock under different stress paths[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 38(5): 973-981. (in Chinese) [10] 邓华锋, 王哲, 李建林, 等. 卸荷速率和孔隙水压力对砂岩卸荷特性影响研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2017,39(11):1976-1983. (DENG Huafeng, WANG Zhe, LI Jianlin, et al. Effect of unloading rate and pore water pressure on mechanical properties of sandstone[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(11): 1976-1983. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE201711004 [11] HUANG D, LI Y R. Conversion of strain energy in triaxial unloading tests on marble[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2014, 66: 160-168. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.12.001 [12] ZONG Y J, HAN L J, WEI J J, et al. Mechanical and damage evolution properties of sandstone under triaxial compression[J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2016, 26(4): 601-607. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2016.05.011 [13] LI J L, WANG L H, WANG X X, et al. Research on unloading nonlinear mechanical characteristics of jointed rock masses[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 2(4): 357-364. [14] 章航, 王志亮, 卢志堂, 等. 循环冲击荷载下花岗岩力学特性尺寸效应[J]. 水利水运工程学报,2020(2):107-115. (ZHANG Hang, WANG Zhiliang, LU Zhitang, et al. Size effect of mechanical properties of granite under cyclic impact loading[J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2020(2): 107-115. (in Chinese) [15] 黄佑鹏, 王志亮, 毕程程. 岩石爆破损伤范围及损伤分布特征模拟分析[J]. 水利水运工程学报,2018(5):95-102. (HUANG Youpeng, WANG Zhiliang, BI Chengcheng. Simulation analysis of blast-induced damage scope and its distribution characteristics of rocks[J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2018(5): 95-102. (in Chinese) [16] 吕颖慧, 刘泉声, 江浩. 基于高应力下花岗岩卸荷试验的力学变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学,2010,31(2):337-344. (LÜ Yinghui, LIU Quansheng, JIANG Hao. Study of mechanical deformation characteristics of granite in unloading experiments of high stress[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(2): 337-344. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2010.02.001 [17] 张黎明, 王在泉, 石磊. 硬质岩石卸荷破坏特性试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2011,30(10):2012-2018. (ZHANG Liming, WANG Zaiquan, SHI Lei. Experimental study of hard rock failure characteristic under unloading condition[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 30(10): 2012-2018. (in Chinese) [18] 高春玉, 徐进, 何鹏, 等. 大理岩加卸载力学特性的研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(3):456-460. (GAO Chunyu, XU Jin, HE Peng, et al. Study on mechanical properties of marble under loading and unloading conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(3): 456-460. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2005.03.015 -
点击查看大图
图(7) / 表 (1)
计量
- 文章访问数: 439
- HTML全文浏览量: 159
- PDF下载量: 36
- 被引次数: 0
