Email Alerts
RSS
Applicability analysis of turbulence model for numerical calculation of hydraulic performance of siphon outlet conduit
-
摘要: 为寻求适用于大型低扬程泵站虹吸式出水流道水力性能数值计算的湍流模型，首先采用透明流道模型对某低扬程泵站虹吸式出水流道进行了试验研究，测试了流道水头损失并分析了流道内流态; 在网格无关性分析的基础上，选择常用的一方程湍流模型(S-A湍流模型)、二方程湍流模型(k-ε湍流模型、k-ω湍流模型)及Reynolds Stress湍流模型分别对该虹吸式出水流道水力性能进行了三维湍流流动数值计算，并将计算结果与模型试验结果进行比较。结果表明：与一方程湍流模型和Reynolds Stress湍流模型相比，二方程湍流模型在虹吸式出水流道水头损失的计算中更具优越性，采用Standard k-ε，Realizable k-ε和SST k-ω等3种二方程湍流模型计算得到的流道水头损失相对误差小于3%，其中，Standard k-ε湍流模型计算得到的流场与模型试验结果最吻合。Abstract: In order to find a turbulence model suitable for numerical calculation of hydraulic performance of the siphon outlet conduit in a large-scale low-head pumping station, a transparent conduit model experiment method is used to conduct experimental studies on the siphon outlet conduit in the large-scale low-head pumping station in this study. The head loss of the flow through the conduit is measured, and the flow regime in the conduit analyzed. Further, based on the grid-independence analysis, some of the commonly-used turbulence models, including the one-equation turbulence model (S-A turbulence model), two-equation turbulence models (k-ε turbulence model and k-ω turbulence model), and Reynolds Stress turbulence model, are selected to numerically simulate the hydraulic performances of the siphon outlet conduit with three-dimensional (3D) turbulent flow, and the numerical calculation results are compared with the model test results of the conduit. The research results show that the two-equation turbulence model is superior to the one-equation turbulence model and the Reynolds Stress turbulence model in the calculation of the head loss of the siphon outlet conduit. The relative errors of the head loss calculated by the three two-equation turbulence models (i.e. standard k-ε turbulence model, realizable k-ε turbulence model and SST k-ω turbulence model) are less than 3%. Among them, the flow field calculated by the Standard k-ε turbulence model is the most consistent with the model test results.
-
Key words:
- siphon outlet conduit /
- hydraulic performance /
- turbulence model /
- numerical calculation /
- model test
-
图 1 虹吸式出水流道单线图(单位：mm)
Figure 1. Single line diagram of siphon outlet conduit (unit: mm)
图 4 出水流道计算区域及网格剖分
Figure 4. Calculation area of outlet conduit and its mesh generation
图 5 不同湍流模型下的虹吸式出水流道流场
Figure 5. Flow field of siphon outlet conduit in different turbulence models
表 1 不同网格数量时的虹吸式出水流道水头损失计算结果
Table 1. Calculation results of head loss for siphon outlet conduit under different grid numbers
网格数量/104个 不同湍流模型下的流道水头损失/m S-A VBP S-A SBP Standard k-ε RNG k-ε Realizable k-ε Standard k-ω SST k-ω Reynolds Stress 15.0 0.289 0.287 0.309 0.299 0.308 0.307 0.306 0.274 17.1 0.285 0.285 0.305 0.295 0.306 0.304 0.303 0.272 22.0 0.283 0.284 0.303 0.293 0.304 0.302 0.302 0.270 25.0 0.281 0.283 0.302 0.292 0.303 0.301 0.301 0.268 28.2 0.281 0.283 0.302 0.291 0.302 0.300 0.301 0.267 33.7 0.281 0.283 0.302 0.291 0.302 0.298 0.301 0.266 38.6 0.281 0.283 0.302 0.291 0.302 0.298 0.301 0.266 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 不同湍流模型时的虹吸式出水流道水头损失
Table 2. Head loss of siphon outlet conduit in different turbulence models
湍流模型 流道水头损失/m 流道损失系数/ (10-4s2·m-5) 相对误差/% S-A VBP 0.281 2.58 -9.35 S-A SBP 0.283 2.60 -8.71 Standard k-ε 0.302 2.77 -2.58 RNG k-ε 0.291 2.67 -6.13 Realizable k-ε 0.302 2.77 -2.58 Standard k-ω 0.298 2.74 -3.87 SST k-ω 0.301 2.76 -2.90 Reynolds Stress 0.266 2.44 -14.19
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 陆林广, 杲东彦, 祝婕.大型泵站虹吸式出水流道优化水力设计[J].农业机械学报, 2005, 36(4): 60-63. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1298.2005.04.016 LU Linguang, GAO Dongyan, ZHU Jie. Optimized hydraulic design of siphon outlet in large pumping stations [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery, 2005, 36(4): 60-63. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1298.2005.04.016 [2] 徐磊, 陆林广, 梁金栋, 等.低扬程泵装置优化水力设计的关键问题[J].水利水运工程学报, 2012(2): 62-70. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-640X.2012.02.010 XU Lei, LU Linguang, LIANG Jindong, et al. A study of the key problem of optimum hydraulic design for a pump system with low head [J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2012(2): 62-70. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-640X.2012.02.010 [3] 丁军, 丁庆朋.胥浦活水泵站肘形进水流道流态分析及优化[J].水利水运工程学报, 2015(3):88-94. http://slsygcxb.cnjournals.org/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=201503013&flag=1 DING Jun, DING Qingpeng. Flow pattern analysis and optimization of elbow inlet conduits in Xupu running water pumping station [J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2015(3): 88-94. (in Chinese) http://slsygcxb.cnjournals.org/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=201503013&flag=1 [4] 徐磊, 陆林广, 王海, 等.竖井式进水流道尺寸对水力性能的影响[J].水利水运工程学报, 2014(5): 47-52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-640X.2014.05.008 XU Lei, LU Linguang, WANG Hai, et al. Influence of control size on shaft inlet conduit on hydraulic performance [J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2014(5): 47-52. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-640X.2014.05.008 [5] 王福军.流体机械旋转湍流计算模型研究进展[J].农业机械学报, 2016, 47(2):1-14. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/nyjxxb201602001 WANG Fujun. Research progress of computational model for rotating turbulent flow in fluid machinery [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery, 2016, 47(2):1-14. (in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/nyjxxb201602001 [6] 张德胜, 施卫东, 张华, 等.不同湍流模型在轴流泵性能预测中的应用[J].农业工程学报, 2012, 28(1): 66-71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2012.01.013 ZHANG Desheng, SHI Weidong, ZHANG Hua, et al. Application of different turbulence models for predicting performance of axial flow pump[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2012, 28(1): 66-71. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2012.01.013 [7] 张淑佳, 李贤华, 朱保林, 等. k-ε涡粘湍流模型用于离心泵数值模拟的适用性[J].机械工程学报, 2009, 45(4): 238-242. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=jxgcxb200904041 ZHANG Shujia, LI Xianhua, ZHU Baolin, et al. Applicability of k-ε eddy viscosity turbulence models on numerical simulation of centrifugal pump[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2009, 45(4): 238-242. (in Chinese) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=jxgcxb200904041 [8] 丛国辉, 王福军.湍流模型在泵站进水池漩涡模拟中的适用性研究[J].农业工程学报, 2008, 24(6): 31-35. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/nygcxb200806006 CONG Guohui, WANG Fujun. Applicability of turbulence models in numerical simulation of vortex flow in pump sump[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2008, 24(6): 31-35. (in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/nygcxb200806006 [9] 印超.泵站前池流态改善三维数值模拟研究[D].扬州: 扬州大学, 2007. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-11117-2007149486.htm YIN Chao. Three-dimensional numerical simulation study on flow state improvement of pump station forebay[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2007. (in Chinese) http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-11117-2007149486.htm [10] 祝婕.宝应泵站进出水流道优化水力设计及模型试验研究[D].扬州: 扬州大学, 2005. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=degree&id=Y748094 ZHU Jie. Optimized hydraulic design and model test study of inlet and outlet conduit of Baoying pump station[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2005. (in Chinese) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=degree&id=Y748094 [11] 陆林广, 吴开平, 冷豫, 等.泵站出水流道模型水力损失的测试[J].排灌机械, 2005, 23(5): 23-26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8530.2005.05.005 LU Linguang, WU Kaiping, LENG Yu, et al. Measurement for hydraulic loss of outlet conduit of pumping station[J]. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering, 2005, 23(5): 23-26. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8530.2005.05.005 [12] 梁金栋.低扬程立式泵装置优化水力设计研究[D].扬州: 扬州大学, 2012. LIANG Jindong. Optimization of hydraulic design for low head vertical pump device[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2012. (in Chinese) [13] CHEN H X, GUO J H. Numerical simulation of 3-D turbulent flow in the multi-intakes sump of the pump station[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics(Ser B), 2007, 19(1): 42-47. doi: 10.1016/S1001-6058(07)60026-2 [14] 王福军.计算流体动力学分析[M].北京:清华大学出版社, 2004. WANG Fujun. Computational fluid dynamics analysis[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2004. (in Chinese) -
点击查看大图
图(5) / 表 (2)
计量
- 文章访问数: 365
- HTML全文浏览量: 275
- PDF下载量: 10
- 被引次数: 0
